OVERVIEW

Crypto March Madness Bracket Report: Three Blue Chips, Zero Wins After a Red February 😐️ 

Before we dive in, here’s today’s crypto market heatmap:

Source: finviz

And here’s a look at crypto’s total market and altcoin market cap charts:

Source: TradingView

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
March Madness Scouting Report – Bitcoin 🪙

• Seed: #6 (ranked 6th out of 12 months by average return – middle of the bracket)

• Conference: Blue Blood (BTC Maxi Division)

• Head Coach: Narrative Momentum (has a losing record in March)

• School: University of Satoshi, est. 2009

BIO:

I’m a legacy program. First name on every analyst’s bracket. I’ve got the brand, the history, the alumni network. But here’s the thing about March – I kind of suck at it. 37.5% win rate. Ten losses in sixteen tournaments. My average return looks respectable (+10.2%) but that’s because of ONE game in 2013 where I dropped 189 points and everyone still talks about it like I do.

Key Stats 🔢 

• Win Rate: 37.5% – not even making the NIT with this record

• Average Return: +10.2% – inflated by one game. Like averaging 40 because you scored 189 once and 4 the rest of the time.

• REAL Average (sans 2013): -1.7%. There he is.

• Median Return: -2.0%. More likely to lose than win.

• Average Intramonth Range: 47.6% of open. Volatile. This team plays chaotic ball.

• Monthly Power Ranking: #6 out of 12 months. He’s middle of the bracket. November (#1) and April (#2) are the months that actually show up. March is filler.

SCOUTING STRENGTHS 🟢

• The hot streak is real. Four consecutive green Marches from 2021-2024 (+30.5%, +5.4%, +23.0%, +16.6%).

• When he wins, he finishes. Green Marches close at 80% of their range on average. No lead-blowing. No choking with the ball.

• Low drawdowns in winning months. Average max drawdown in green months: just -8.0%. Doesn’t give you a heart attack on the way to a W.

• Bear market survival instinct. 2022 was a confirmed bear market. BTC still won March (+5.4%). 2023 was chaos (SVB, Signature Bank collapsing). BTC won March (+23.0%). Occasionally shows up in hostile environments.

SCOUTING WEAKNESSES 🔴

• THE RED FEBRUARY CURSE. This is the stat that should be on a billboard. After a red February, Bitcoin’s March win rate is 0-for-5. ZERO PERCENT. 

• Streaky in the worst way. Five consecutive losing Marches (2014-2018) followed by four consecutive wins (2021-2024) followed by another loss.

• Red months close at the bottom. Red Marches close at 28% of their range on average. He’s drifting to the floor. No fourth-quarter comeback energy.

• The 2013 lie. Every Bitcoin March stat is propped up by one outlier. +188.7% in a single month. Remove it and this is a 33% win rate with a negative average return.

GAME TAPE BREAKDOWN 🎬

• After Green February (11 games): 6-5 (55% win rate). Coin flip.

• After Red February (5 games): 0-5 (0% win rate). Red February has been a death sentence for March. No exceptions. No close calls. Just losses.

• Drawdown Profile – Red Months: When March goes red, the average drawdown is -20.7%. That’s getting your ankles broken and carried off the floor, not Lebron phantom slapped by a ghost.

• Drawdown Profile – Green Months: Average max drawdown of just -8.0%. The 2021 green March barely dipped at all (-0.1%). 2024 only pulled back -3.0%. When March is going to be green, you can usually tell because it doesn’t stab you on the way there.

• Close Position – The Tell: Green Marches close at 80% of range. Red Marches close at 28%. If Bitcoin is sitting in the bottom third of its monthly range in the last week of March, history says it’s staying there.

COACH’S QUOTE:

“We know March isn’t our month historically. 37.5% isn’t where we want to be. But we’ve shown we can put together runs. Four straight tournament wins from ’21 to ’24. The guys just need to find that rhythm again. Is this the year? February was rough. And historically when February is rough… [shuffles papers] …I’m going to defer to our analytics department on that one. Next question.”

VERDICT: 6-SEED. FIRST-ROUND UPSET CANDIDATE. 🏀

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
March Madness Scouting Report – Ethereum 🥈

Ethereum 💜

• Seed: #4 (ranked 4th out of 12 months by average return – upper bracket)

• Conference: Smart Contract Elite (DeFi Division)

• Head Coach: Follow-Through (91% continuation rate from February – whatever February does, this team copies it)

• School: Vitalik Tech, est. 2015

BIO:

“I’m the team everyone slots into the Sweet Sixteen because the record looks good. 63.6% win rate. Seven wins in eleven tournaments. Top-4 seed. Sounds great, right? But let me tell you what the paper doesn’t say: I lose to Bitcoin head-to-head in March 73% of the time. SEVENTY-THREE PERCENT. I’ve got the better win rate, the better average, and I STILL can’t beat the old man when it matters.

The other thing you should know: I am one of the most predictable teams in the tournament. Whatever I did in February, I do in March. 91% of the time. If February was good, ride with me. If February was bad – and it was bad – maybe don’t pick me to cut down the nets.”

Key Stats 🔢 

• Win Rate: 63.6% – best of the blue chips? Probably. Tournament-caliber for sure.

• Average Return: +24.2% – inflated by one game.

• REAL Average (sans 2017): +4.1%. Fine. Not elite. Fine.

• Median Return: +6.4%. Honest number. Slightly positive. More likely to win than lose, which is more than BTC can say in March.

• Best Game: +225.6% (2017). Will be talked about forever.

• Worst Game: -54.8% (2018) – program-worst. Dropped nearly 60% intramonth before closing down 55%. The game tape is classified.

• Average Intramonth Range: 61.5% of open. WIDER than Bitcoin (47.6%).

• Monthly Power Ranking: #4 out of 12 months. Above average. May (#1), January (#2), and February (#3) all outrank March, but it’s still a strong month.

SCOUTING STRENGTHS 🟢

• The February Continuation Engine. This is the defining trait of Ethereum in March. Whatever February does, March copies it 91% of the time (10 out of 11 years).

• After a green February: 88% win rate. Seven out of eight times. The only miss was COVID (2020).

• Four consecutive March wins (2021-2024). Same streak as Bitcoin, but ETH’s was more dominant.

• Green months finish strong. Average close position: 77% of range. 2023 closed at 95% of range – essentially the high of the month.

• Shallow drawdowns in wins. Average max drawdown in green months: -7.1%. That includes the 2022 pull back of -14.4% before recovering. In 2016 and 2017 – the big wins – the max drawdown was -0.2%. Basically zero.

• Legitimate 63.6% win rate. This isn’t faked by one outlier. Even without 2017, it’s still 60%. This team wins more often than it loses in March.

SCOUTING WEAKNESSES 🔴

• THE RED FEBRUARY CURSE – SHARED WITH BITCOIN. After a red February, Ethereum’s March win rate is 0-for-3. Zero percent. 

• When ETH loses in March, it LOSES. Average drawdown in red months: -32.3%. There is no “competitive loss” in ETH’s red March history. It’s either a win or a blowout loss. No in-between.

• Red months close at 22% of range. Dead bottom. 2018 closed at 6%. 2020 at 28%. When ETH is losing in March, it closes near the monthly low. No late-game comeback. No garbage-time rally. Just defeat.

• BTC owns this matchup. ETH beats BTC in March only 27% of the time (3 wins out of 11 head-to-heads). And those 3 wins? 2016, 2017, and 2022. The first two were when ETH was a baby nobody was guarding. Since 2019, BTC has won 6 straight head-to-heads against ETH in March.

• Bear year March? 25% win rate. One win in four bear-year Marches (2022’s +12.4% being the lone survivor). If you think 2026 is a bear year, ETH’s historical odds in March drop to a coin flip at best, death sentence at worst.

GAME TAPE BREAKDOWN 🎬

• After Green February (8 games): 7-1 (88%). This is ETH’s bread and butter. The only loss was March 2020 (COVID), and that’s arguably an act of God, not a basketball game.

• After Red February (3 games): 0-3 (0%). Small sample – but the losses are -54.8%, -2.2%, and -1.9%. That’s two quiet losses and one massacre.

• The Continuation Rate: 91%. Ten out of eleven Marches matched February’s direction. The only break was 2020 (green Feb → red March). That means ETH’s March is essentially Q1’s overtime period.

• The Blowout Problem. ETH’s two worst Marches (-54.8% in 2018, -39.0% in 2020) both saw intramonth drawdowns exceeding -58%.

• The 4-Peat (2021-2024). Four straight March wins averaging +12.9%.

COACH’S QUOTE:

“Our February-to-March continuation rate speaks for itself. 91%. We play connected basketball – one month flows into the next. When February’s good, we ride that energy. When it’s not… look, February wasn’t good. And historically when February isn’t good, we haven’t found a way to flip it in March. We’re 0-for-3 in that spot. But this team has character. Four straight March wins before last year. We know how to compete in this month. The matchup against BTC? [long pause] Next question.”

VERDICT: 4-SEED. BETTER RECORD, WORSE MATCHUP.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
March Madness Scouting Report – XRP ✖️

• Seed: #9 (ranked 9th out of 12 months by average return – deep in the lower bracket, play-in game territory)

• Conference: Litigation & Payments (SEC Settlement Division)

• Head Coach: Chaos Theory (85% continuation rate from February – rides momentum in whichever direction it’s already going, including off a cliff)

• School: Ripple State University, est. 2012 – “We’re Not A Security” is the fight song

BIO:

“Listen. I know what you’re thinking. ‘XRP in February was a disaster – is March any better?’ And the answer is… sort of? I am a coin flip between a funeral and a party. Also, my March ranks #9 out of 12 months. February was #12. So technically March is my glow-up. Don’t fact-check what that means in actual numbers.”

COMBINE MEASURABLES

Win Rate: 46.2% – below .500. The selection committee would leave him out.

Average Return: -1.8%. Negative. His AVERAGE outcome is a loss.

Median Return: -2.2%. Also negative. Both central tendency measures say you lose money in XRP in March.

Best Game: +41.1% (2023) – incredible March Madness upset. Came off a red February. Made no sense.

Worst Game: -43.8% (2018) – program-worst. Down 50% intramonth before closing down 44%.

Average Intramonth Range: 31.1% of open. Less volatile than February (which was 176%), but that’s like saying the tornado was smaller than the hurricane. Still a tornado.

Monthly Power Ranking: #9 out of 12 months. Bottom quartile. March is one of XRP’s worst months.

SCOUTING STRENGTHS 🟢

• After a green February: PERFECT. 4-for-4. 100%. Every time February was green, March was green. 2016, 2017, 2022, 2024 – all wins. Small sample, but a perfect sample.

• The Comeback Gene. Two of XRP’s biggest March wins came AFTER red Februaries. 2021: Feb -7.3% → March +34.1%. 2023: Feb -5.6% → March +41.1%. Combined +75% across those two games.

• Four consecutive green Marches (2021-2024). The longest winning streak in program history. XRP went from a team that lost three straight (2018-2020) to winning four straight.

• The 85% February continuation rate. Eleven out of thirteen Marches matched February’s direction.

SCOUTING WEAKNESSES 🔴

• Both the average AND median return are negative. -1.8% average. -2.2% median.

• After back-to-back red January AND February: 0-for-2 (now 0-for-3). You’re looking at the third iteration of this pattern, and the first two weren’t close. They were massacres.

• Loses to EVERYBODY head-to-head. BTC beats XRP in March 62% of the time (8-5). ETH beats XRP in March 64% of the time (7-4). XRP is the team that loses to both conference rivals in the same weekend.

• Red months are violent. Average drawdown in red Marches: -24.6%. And that includes the “gentle” losses of 2019 (-7.5%), 2025 (-9.4%), and 2026 (-4.5%). The floor is not your friend.

• Red months close at 27% of range. When this team is losing, it just drifts to the bottom and dies there.

• March ranks #9 out of 12 months. This is not a strong month for the program. XRP saves his energy for December (#1, +62.8% average), April (#2, +59.4%), and November (#3, +54.9%). March gets the JV squad.

GAME TAPE BREAKDOWN 🎬

• The Two XRPs. This is the defining characteristic. After green February, you get Reliable XRP: 100% win rate, modest gains (+2.9% to +4.7%), no drama. After red February, you get Chaos XRP: 29% win rate, but the two wins are +34% and +41%.

• The Continuation Engine. 85% continuation rate from February. Eleven of thirteen Marches matched February’s direction.

• The 15% Chaos Factor. The two times XRP reversed a red February were 2021 (+34.1%) and 2023 (+41.1%). Both were explosive. Both came out of nowhere. Both happened during years where XRP had significant fundamental catalysts (SEC lawsuit developments).

• The Streak Pattern. XRP’s March history reads in blocks: Red-Red (2014-2015), Green-Green (2016-2017), Red-Red-Red (2018-2020), Green-Green-Green-Green (2021-2024), Red-Red (2025-2026 in progress).

COACH’S QUOTE:

“Marchis not is our month. It’s not. We’re 6-7. Our average return is negative. We rank 9th out of 12. I know the numbers. But what the numbers don’t capture is the SPIRIT of this team. 2021 – red February, everyone counted us out, we put up 34%. 2023 – same thing, red February, we put up 41%. This team has a comeback gene that doesn’t show up in the spreadsheet. [Reporter: Coach, what about the five times you DIDN’T come back after a red February?] …I’m going to choose to focus on the positives. [Reporter: There are two positives and five negatives.] …Next question.”

VERDICT: 9-SEED. NEGATIVE EXPECTED VALUE WITH UPSET POTENTIAL.

STOCKTWITS
Latest Stocktwits Podcasts & Videos 😱

The Latest Cryptotwits Podcast – Jane Street, Terra, and the “10AM Flush” Rumor: What’s Really Going On?

The Howard Lindzon Show – Five Hindenburg Omens + AI Taking Over-What’s Actually Happening

True Odds Podcast – Discipline Trades, AI Panic, WBC Futures, and Random Markets

Retail Edge –Is PayPal About to Be Acquired?

Talking Tickers – Meta’s CapEx, Palantir’s “Unbelievable” Valuation, and Nike’s Turnaround Path

StocktwitsTV – Tom Sosnoff Unveils Lossdog: Fixing Wage Inequity With a Trading Style Platform

The Philosphical Quant – Why Tight Stops Beat High Accuracy Every Single Time

Boardroom Exclusives – Boxabl CFO Martin Noe Costas: How They’re Mass Producing Homes Like iPhones

Get In Touch 📬

Email me, Jonathan Morgan, feedback; I’d love to hear from you. 📧
Follow me on Stocktwits 🫂 And Sponsor this newsletter 😎 

Terms & Conditions 📝

Securities Disclaimer: STOCKTWITS IS NOT A TAX ADVISOR, BROKER, FINANCIAL ADVISOR OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. THE SERVICE IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE TAX, LEGAL, FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND NOTHING ON THE SERVICE SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN OFFER TO SELL, A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, OR A RECOMMENDATION FOR ANY SECURITY. Trading in such securities can result in immediate and substantial losses of the capital invested. You should only invest risk capital, and not capital required for other purposes. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any other product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. You should also consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. The Content is to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only and the Service does not provide investment advice for any individual. Stocktwits, its affiliates and partners specifically disclaim any and all liability or loss arising out of any action taken in reliance on Content, including but not limited to market value or other loss on the sale or purchase of any company, property, product, service, security, instrument, or any other matter. You understand that an investment in any security is subject to a number of risks, and that discussions of any security published on the Service will not contain a list or description of relevant risk factors. In addition, please note that some of the stocks about which Content is published on the Service have a low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float. Such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information. Read the full terms & conditions here. 🔍

Author Disclosure: The author of this newsletter holds positions in AVAX, ADA, PUDGY, WLC, IMX, XTZ, NEAR, HBAR, ALGO, INJ, LTC, LINK, ZEC, XLM, and FET. 📋